Assessment of a Country as a Market (9BS0 4.2.2)
Before entering a new country, a business must judge whether enough customers can buy, whether goods can reach them, and whether trading conditions allow profit. Edexcel lists specific assessment factors — learn them and apply them to a live example such as India.
The Edexcel assessment factors
The specification names these factors for assessing a country as a market:
- Levels and growth of disposable income — can consumers afford the product, and is affordability rising?
- Ease of doing business — how quickly can a firm register, enforce contracts and trade without excessive bureaucracy or corruption?
- Infrastructure — roads, ports, power, internet and payment systems that let goods and services reach buyers.
- Political stability — predictable policy and low risk of unrest or expropriation.
- Exchange rate — the level and volatility of the currency, which affect prices, repatriated profits and planning.
The logic is sequential: income determines whether a market exists; ease of doing business and infrastructure determine whether it can be served; stability and currency determine whether profits survive the journey home. A weakness in any link can undermine strengths in the others, so assessment is about the whole chain, not a single dazzling statistic.
Applying the factors: India
India shows the factors in action. Income: growth of about 6.5% in 2024 and a middle class in the hundreds of millions make it a priority market — Apple's India revenue climbed to record levels approaching $8 billion in its 2024 financial year, and the company opened its first Indian stores. Unilever's Hindustan subsidiary reaches hundreds of millions of consumers with pack sizes engineered for local budgets.
Ease of doing business: improving but uneven — regulation varies by state, and tariffs on some imports remain high, which is why many entrants localise production. Infrastructure: rapidly upgrading, with digital payments (UPI) transforming retail, though logistics costs stay above Chinese levels. Political stability: strong democratic continuity, with policy shifts around foreign retail investment as a watch-item. Exchange rate: the rupee has depreciated gently against the dollar for years — manageable, but it erodes repatriated profits and must be priced in.
Weighing the factors and reaching judgements
Factor weighting depends on the business model. A luxury brand weighs income distribution in big cities more than national averages; an e-commerce firm depends on digital infrastructure and logistics; a bank cares most about regulation and stability. Time horizon matters too: current income suits a quick-payback exporter, while growth trends suit a firm investing in brand presence for the 2030s.
Evaluation should also recognise trade-offs and evidence quality. High-growth markets often score poorly on ease of doing business — the reward compensates the friction — and official statistics can flatter or lag reality, so firms triangulate with pilot launches and local partners. A strong exam judgement names the two or three factors most decisive for the firm in the case, justifies the weighting from its product and resources, and accepts that entry mode (exporting, licensing, joint venture, FDI) can be chosen to offset the weakest factor rather than abandoning the market.
Key terms
Practice questions
Explain one reason why growth of disposable income matters more than its current level to some businesses assessing a market. [4 marks]
Model answer guidance: A firm investing for the long term profits from where customers will be, not where they are. Rapid income growth, such as India's economy expanding around 6.5% in 2024, creates millions of first-time buyers of branded goods each year. Entering early builds distribution and brand loyalty before rivals, even if current sales are modest. A market with high but stagnant income offers no such compounding advantage.
Explain one way poor infrastructure can reduce the attractiveness of an otherwise large market. [4 marks]
Model answer guidance: If roads, ports or power are unreliable, distribution costs rise and delivery times lengthen, so products reach consumers late, damaged or expensively. A large population is worthless commercially if goods cannot reach it at competitive cost. Weak digital infrastructure similarly blocks e-commerce models entirely. High logistics costs must be recovered in prices, which can make an affordable product unaffordable and hand the market to local producers.
Discuss how exchange-rate considerations should influence a UK firm's assessment of an emerging market. [8 marks]
Model answer guidance: The firm should examine both level and volatility. A gradually depreciating local currency, like the rupee, steadily erodes the sterling value of profits earned there, so forecast returns must be discounted accordingly. High volatility complicates pricing and planning, and hedging emerging-market currencies is costlier than hedging dollars. However, currency weakness also cuts the cost of local production and wages, which helps if the firm manufactures locally or exports from the market. Exchange rates rarely veto an otherwise strong market, but they should shape entry mode and financial planning.
Assess which factors a premium smartphone maker should prioritise when assessing India as a market. [12 marks]
Model answer guidance: For a premium device maker, income distribution matters more than averages: the target is India's urban affluent segment, already large enough to push Apple's India revenue towards $8 billion in 2024. Infrastructure ranks second — retail presence, e-commerce logistics and mobile networks determine whether premium buyers can be reached and served. Ease of doing business, particularly import tariffs, is significant because high duties inflate prices; local assembly, which Apple has expanded, offsets this. Political stability and currency matter but are manageable background risks. The priority order therefore follows the model: find the affluent segment, reach it efficiently, and use production strategy to neutralise the weakest factor.
Evaluate whether a country with rapid income growth but a poor ease-of-doing-business record is an attractive market for a UK retailer. (20) [20 marks]
Model answer guidance: Rapid income growth is the scarcest prize in retail: it creates new customers annually and rewards early brand-building, as India — growing about 6.5% with surging digital payments — demonstrates for entrants from Apple to Unilever. Difficult business conditions, meanwhile, are a cost rather than an absence of opportunity: bureaucracy, uneven regulation and slow contract enforcement raise entry expenses and risk, but they also deter weaker competitors, so friction can protect early movers who master it. The balance depends on the retailer's resources and entry mode: a large firm can absorb compliance costs and use joint ventures or franchising to borrow local capability, while a small retailer without local partners could be overwhelmed. Timing judgement matters too — conditions in reforming economies tend to improve, and waiting for comfort often means arriving after rivals. Overall, such a market is attractive for well-resourced retailers with patient capital and strong local partnerships, unattractive for firms needing quick, low-risk returns; the deciding factor is capacity to manage friction, not the friction itself.
Examiner tips
- List the five spec factors (income, ease of doing business, infrastructure, stability, exchange rate) and apply at least three to the case.
- India is your strongest example: ~6.5% growth, Apple nearing $8bn revenue, improving infrastructure, tariff quirks.
- Reach judgements by ranking factors for the specific firm — a luxury brand and a budget retailer weight the same country differently.
In The Business School simulation your students make these exact decisions in a live market against rival firms — every choice mapped to the specification. Free teacher demo, no installs, students join with a PIN.